En una carta al Director de la OCDE para Evaluación Internacional de Estudiantes, publicada en The Guardian, 83 académicos y docentes de primer nivel de todo el mundo, piden que se cancele la próxima ronda de pruebas. Advierten sobre “posibles daños” a la educación provocados por las pruebas Pisa.
La carta publicada en The Guardian, estuvo dirigida al Director de la OCDE para Evaluación Internacional de Estudiantes (pruebas Pisa), Dr. Andreas Schleicher, y advierte preocupaciones en la manera de elaborar las pruebas y los rankings PISA. Los 88 docentes, entre los que se destacan rectores universitarios, expertos en educación y directores de prestigiosas instituciones, piden un alto en la próxima ronda de pruebas y plantean nuevas soluciones.
En primera instancia, los expertos describen que las pruebas Pisa miden “logros académicos de los estudiantes de 15 años de edad en matemáticas, ciencias, y la lectura. Cada tres años, los resultados de Pisa se esperan ansiosos por los gobiernos, ministros de educación y los consejos editoriales de los periódicos, y se citan con autoridad en un sin número de informes políticos. Como resultado de Pisa, los países están revisando sus sistemas educativos con la esperanza de mejorar sus clasificaciones”.
Algunos de los puntos que los expertos cuestionan son:
- Pisa ha promovido el surgimiento de nuevas pruebas estandarizadas que revelan datos imperfectos sobre el nivel educativo de los alumnos.
- Hay un foco en corto plazo y no permite establecer políticas a largo plazo necesarias para que la educación mejore.
- Pisa no toma en cuenta aspectos como el desarrollo físico, moral, cívico y artístico, por lo tanto es “peligroso” para la visión social acerca de la educación.
- OCDE utiliza una idea sesgada sobre la función económica de las escuelas públicas, poniendo énfasis en educar chicos para el mercado laboral. “Deben considerarse seres completos, como su participación en un gobierno democrático, el comportamiento y una vida de desarrollo personal, crecimiento y bienestar, más allá del rendimiento en cosas concretas”.
- Para estos docentes, OCDE no tiene claro los mandatos legítimos para mejorar la educación y la vida de los niños alrededor del mundo. Tampoco los mecanismos de participación democrática efectiva en su proceso de toma de decisiones en la vida educativa.
- Critican que la OCDE haya entrado en alianza con empresas multinacionales con fines de lucro para la realización de la prueba. “Estas empresas pueden beneficiarse económicamente de altos y bajos puntajes en pruebas Pisa. Algunas de estas empresas ofrecen servicios educativos a las escuelas estadounidenses y, a la vez, instalan planes de desarrollo de educación primaria con fines de lucro en África, donde la OCDE ahora está planeando introducir el programa Pisa”.
- La carta indica: “las pruebas perjudican a nuestros hijos y empobrecen nuestras aulas, ya que implican, inevitablemente, cada vez más largas baterías de pruebas de opción múltiple. Y lo más preocupante es que los maestros no tienen autonomía en esto. De esta manera, Pisa ha incrementado aún más el nivel de estrés ya alto en las escuelas lo que pone en peligro el bienestar de los estudiantes y profesores. Estos avances están en conflicto abierto con los principios ampliamente aceptados de la buena práctica educativa y democrática”.
- En cuanto a la “calidad educativa”, los docentes afirman que “ninguna reforma educativa de ningún tipo, debe basarse en un concepto acotado de calidad”. “Ninguna reforma debe pasar por alto el valor importante de los factores no educativos”, entre los cuales se destaca la desigualdad socio-económica de un país y la participación en la vida democrática.
La carta propone algunas soluciones para “ayudar a aliviar las preocupaciones antes mencionadas”:
1- Desarrollar alternativas a las tablas de clasificación: explorar formas más significativas y menos sensacionalistas de informar los resultados de la evaluación. Por ejemplo, la comparación de los “países en desarrollo”, en donde niños de 15 años trabajan frecuentemente, con niños del primer mundo que no se enfrentan a esa situación no tiene sentido, ni educativo ni político. Enfrenta a la OCDE para las acusaciones de colonialismo educativo.
2- Tener en cuenta a una gama de profesionales amplio para discutir sobre qué y cómo se debe evaluar a los estudiantes. La carta dice que no deben incluir sólo “estadísticos, psicométricos y economistas”, sino también padres, educadores, administradores, líderes comunitarios, estudiantes y académicos en disciplinas como antropología, historia, filosofía, lengua, así como artes y humanidades.
3- Incluir a organizaciones nacionales e internacionales en la formulación de métodos y normas que vayan más allá del aspecto económico de la educación pública y se integren aspectos vinculados a la salud, el desarrollo humano, el bienestar y “la felicidad de estudiantes y profesores”. Se recomienda incluir a la ONU, así como a asociaciones de padres, docentes y administradores de los centros, por nombrar algunos.
4- Publicar los costos directos e indirectos que tienen las pruebas para los países miembros de las pruebas. La carta afirma: “los países deberían poder decidir usos alternativos de los millones de dólares gastados en estas pruebas y determinar si quieren continuar participando del programa”.
5- Recomiendan una supervisión por parte equipos internacionales de supervisión independientes, que se puedan observar la administración de Pisa desde la concepción a la ejecución, y evaluar la prueba, los procedimientos estadísticos y de puntuación.
6- Proporcionar informes detallados sobre el papel de las empresas privadas, con ánimo de lucro en la preparación, ejecución y seguimiento de las pruebas “para evitar aparentes o reales conflictos de intereses”.
7- Saltear el próximo periodo de pruebas. “Esto daría tiempo para incorporar el aprendizaje colectivo que resultará de las deliberaciones sugeridas en un modelo nuevo y mejor evaluación” .
Los expertos suponen que “los expertos de Pisa están motivados por un deseo sincero de mejorar la educación, pero no se entiende cómo su organización se ha convertido en el árbitro mundial de los medios y fines de la educación en todo el mundo. Enfoque estrecho de la OCDE en las pruebas estandarizadas arriesga convertir el aprendizaje en la monotonía y matar la alegría de aprender”.
Concluyen la carta diciendo: “Estamos profundamente preocupados de que se utilice un único criterio acotado y sesgado en la medición de una gran diversidad de tradiciones y culturas educativas, lo que provocaría un daño irreparable a nuestras escuelas y nuestros estudiantes”.
OECD and Pisa tests are damaging education worldwide - academics
In this letter to Dr Andreas Schleicher, director of the OECD's Programme for International Student Assessment, academics from around the world express deep concern about the impact of Pisa tests and call for a halt to the next round of testing
Dear Dr Schleicher,
We write to you in your capacity as OECD's (Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development) director of the Programme of International Student Assessment (Pisa). Now in its 13th year, Pisa is known around the world as an instrument to rank OECD and non-OECD countries (60-plus at last count) according to a measure of academic achievement of 15-year-old students in mathematics, science, and reading. Administered every three years, Pisa results are anxiously awaited by governments, education ministers, and the editorial boards of newspapers, and are cited authoritatively in countless policy reports. They have begun to deeply influence educational practices in many countries. As a result of Pisa, countries are overhauling their education systems in the hopes of improving their rankings. Lack of progress on Pisa has led to declarations of crisis and "Pisa shock" in many countries, followed by calls for resignations, and far-reaching reforms according to Pisa precepts.
We are frankly concerned about the negative consequences of the Pisa rankings. These are some of our concerns:
• While standardised testing has been used in many nations for decades (despite serious reservations about its validity and reliability), Pisa has contributed to an escalation in such testing and a dramatically increased reliance on quantitative measures. For example, in the US, Pisa has been invoked as a major justification for the recent "Race to the Top" programme, which has increased the use of standardised testing for student-, teacher-, and administrator evaluations, which rank and label students, as well as teachers and administrators according to the results of tests widely known to be imperfect (see, for example, Finland's unexplained decline from the top of the Pisa table).
• In education policy, Pisa, with its three-year assessment cycle, has caused a shift of attention to short-term fixes designed to help a country quickly climb the rankings, despite research showing that enduring changes in education practice take decades, not a few years, to come to fruition. For example, we know that the status of teachers and the prestige of teaching as a profession have a strong influence on the quality of instruction, but that status varies strongly across cultures and is not easily influenced by short-term policy.
• By emphasising a narrow range of measurable aspects of education, Pisa takes attention away from the less measurable or immeasurable educational objectives like physical, moral, civic and artistic development, thereby dangerously narrowing our collective imagination regarding what education is and ought to be about.
• As an organisation of economic development, OECD is naturally biased in favour of the economic role of public [state] schools. But preparing young men and women for gainful employment is not the only, and not even the main goal of public education, which has to prepare students for participation in democratic self-government, moral action and a life of personal development, growth and wellbeing.
• Unlike United Nations (UN) organisations such as UNESCO or UNICEF that have clear and legitimate mandates to improve education and the lives of children around the world, OECD has no such mandate. Nor are there, at present, mechanisms of effective democratic participation in its education decision-making process.
• To carry out Pisa and a host of follow-up services, OECD has embraced "public-private partnerships" and entered into alliances with multi-national for-profit companies, which stand to gain financially from any deficits—real or perceived—unearthed by Pisa. Some of these companies provide educational services to American schools and school districts on a massive, for-profit basis, while also pursuing plans to develop for-profit elementary education in Africa, where OECD is now planning to introduce the Pisa programme.
• Finally, and most importantly: the new Pisa regime, with its continuous cycle of global testing, harms our children and impoverishes our classrooms, as it inevitably involves more and longer batteries of multiple-choice testing, more scripted "vendor"-made lessons, and less autonomy for teachers. In this way Pisa has further increased the already high stress level in schools, which endangers the wellbeing of students and teachers.
These developments are in overt conflict with widely accepted principles of good educational and democratic practice:
• No reform of any consequence should be based on a single narrow measure of quality.
• No reform of any consequence should ignore the important role of non-educational factors, among which a nation's socio-economic inequality is paramount. In many countries, including the US, inequality has dramatically increased over the past 15 years, explaining the widening educational gap between rich and poor which education reforms, no matter how sophisticated, are unlikely to redress.
• An organisation like OECD, as any organisation that deeply affects the life of our communities, should be open to democratic accountability by members of those communities.
We are writing not only to point out deficits and problems. We would also like to offer constructive ideas and suggestions that may help to alleviate the above mentioned concerns. While in no way complete, they illustrate how learning could be improved without the above mentioned negative effects:
1 Develop alternatives to league tables: explore more meaningful and less easily sensationalised ways of reporting assessment outcomes. For example, comparing developing countries, where 15-year-olds are regularly drafted into child labour, with first-world countries makes neither educational nor political sense and opens OECD up for charges of educational colonialism.
2 Make room for participation by the full range of relevant constituents and scholarship: to date, the groups with greatest influence on what and how international learning is assessed are psychometricians, statisticians, and economists. They certainly deserve a seat at the table, but so do many other groups: parents, educators, administrators, community leaders, students, as well as scholars from disciplines like anthropology, sociology, history, philosophy, linguistics, as well as the arts and humanities. What and how we assess the education of 15-year-old students should be subject to discussions involving all these groups at local, national, and international levels.
3 Include national and international organisations in the formulation of assessment methods and standards whose mission goes beyond the economic aspect of public education and which are concerned with the health, human development, wellbeing and happiness of students and teachers. This would include the above mentioned United Nations organisations, as well as teacher, parent, and administrator associations, to name a few.
4 Publish the direct and indirect costs of administering Pisa so that taxpayers in member countries can gauge alternative uses of the millions of dollars spent on these tests and determine if they want to continue their participation in it.
5 Welcome oversight by independent international monitoring teams which can observe the administration of Pisa from the conception to the execution, so that questions about test format and statistical and scoring procedures can be weighed fairly against charges of bias or unfair comparisons.
6 Provide detailed accounts regarding the role of private, for-profit companies in the preparation, execution, and follow-up to the tri-annual Pisa assessments to avoid the appearance or reality of conflicts of interest.
7 Slow down the testing juggernaut. To gain time to discuss the issues mentioned here at local, national, and international levels, consider skipping the next Pisa cycle. This would give time to incorporate the collective learning that will result from the suggested deliberations in a new and improved assessment model.
We assume that OECD's Pisa experts are motivated by a sincere desire to improve education. But we fail to understand how your organisation has become the global arbiter of the means and ends of education around the world. OECD's narrow focus on standardised testing risks turning learning into drudgery and killing the joy of learning. As Pisa has led many governments into an international competition for higher test scores, OECD has assumed the power to shape education policy around the world, with no debate about the necessity or limitations of OECD's goals. We are deeply concerned that measuring a great diversity of educational traditions and cultures using a single, narrow, biased yardstick could, in the end, do irreparable harm to our schools and our students.
Sincerely,
1) Andrews, Paul - Professor of Mathematics Education, Stockholm University
2) Atkinson, Lori - New York State Allies for Public Education
3) Ball, Stephen J Karl - Mannheim Professor of Sociology of Education, Institute of Education, University of London
4) Barber, Melissa - Parents Against High Stakes Testing
5) Beckett, Lori Winifred - Mercier Professor of Teacher Education, Leeds Metropolitan University
6) Berardi, Jillaine - Linden Avenue Middle School, Assistant Principal
7) Berliner, David Regents Professor of Education at Arizona State University
8) Bloom, Elizabeth EdD Associate Professor of Education, Hartwick College
9) Boudet, Danielle Oneonta Area for Public Education
10) Boland, Neil Senior lecturer, AUT University, Auckland, New Zealand
11) Burris, Carol Principal and former Teacher of the Year
12) Cauthen, Nancy PhD Change the Stakes, NYS Allies for Public Education
13) Cerrone, Chris Testing Hurts Kids; NYS Allies for Public Education
14) Ciaran, Sugrue Professor, Head of School, School of Education, University College Dublin
15) Deutermann, Jeanette Founder Long Island Opt Out, Co-founder NYS Allies for Public Education
16) Devine, Nesta Associate Professor, Auckland University of Technology, New Zealand
17) Dodge, Arnie Chair, Department of Educational Leadership, Long Island University
18) Dodge, Judith Author, Educational Consultant
19) Farley, Tim Principal, Ichabod Crane School; New York State Allies for Public Education
20) Fellicello, Stacia Principal, Chambers Elementary School
21) Fleming, Mary Lecturer, School of Education, National University of Ireland, Galway
22) Fransson, Göran Associate Professor of Education, University of Gävle, Sweden
23) Giroux, Henry Professor of English and Cultural Studies, McMaster University
24) Glass, Gene Senior Researcher, National Education Policy Center, Santa Fe, New Mexico
25) Glynn, Kevin Educator, co-founder of Lace to the Top
26) Goldstein, Harvey Professor of Social Statistics, University of Bristol
27) Gorlewski, David Director, Educational Leadership Doctoral Program, D'Youville College
28) Gorlewski, Julie PhD, Assistant Professor, State University of New York at New Paltz
29) Gowie, Cheryl Professor of Education, Siena College
30) Greene, Kiersten Assistant Professor of Literacy, State University of New York at New Paltz
31) Haimson, Leonie Parent Advocate and Director of "Class Size Matters"
32) Heinz, Manuela Director of Teaching Practice, School of Education, National University of Ireland Galway
33) Hughes, Michelle Principal, High Meadows Independent School
34) Jury, Mark Chair, Education Department, Siena College
35) Kahn, Hudson Valley Against Common Core
36) Kayden, Michelle Linden Avenue Middle School Red Hook, New York
37) Kempf, Arlo Program Coordinator of School and Society, OISE, University of Toronto
38) Kilfoyle, Marla NBCT, General Manager of BATs
39) Labaree, David Professor of Education, Stanford University
40) Leonardatos, Harry Principal, high school, Clarkstown, New York
41) MacBeath, John Professor Emeritus, Director of Leadership for Learning, University of Cambridge
42) McLaren, Peter Distinguished Professor, Chapman University
43) McNair, Jessica Co-founder Opt-Out CNY, parent member NYS Allies for Public Education
44) Meyer, Heinz-Dieter Associate Professor, Education Governance & Policy, State University of New York (Albany)
45) Meyer, Tom Associate Professor of Secondary Education, State University of New York at New Paltz
46) Millham, Rosemary PhD Science Coordinator, Master Teacher Campus Director, SUNY New Paltz
47) Millham, Rosemary Science Coordinator/Assistant Professor, Master Teacher Campus Director, State University of New York, New Paltz
48) Oliveira Andreotti Vanessa Canada Research Chair in Race, Inequality, and Global Change, University of British Columbia
49) Sperry, Carol Emerita, Millersville University, Pennsylvania
50) Mitchell, Ken Lower Hudson Valley Superintendents Council
51) Mucher, Stephen Director, Bard Master of Arts in Teaching Program, Los Angeles
52) Tuck, Eve Assistant Professor, Coordinator of Native American Studies, State University of New York at New Paltz
53) Naison, Mark Professor of African American Studies and History, Fordham University; Co-Founder, Badass Teachers Association
54) Nielsen, Kris Author, Children of the Core
55) Noddings, Nel Professor (emerita) Philosophy of Education, Stanford University
56) Noguera, Pedro Peter L. Agnew Professor of Education, New York University
57) Nunez, Isabel Associate Professor, Concordia University, Chicago
58) Pallas, Aaron Arthur I Gates Professor of Sociology and Education, Columbia University
59) Peters, Michael Professor, University of Waikato, Honorary Fellow, Royal Society New Zealand
60) Pugh, Nigel Principal, Richard R Green High School of Teaching, New York City
61) Ravitch, Diane Research Professor, New York University
62) Rivera-Wilson Jerusalem Senior Faculty Associate and Director of Clinical Training and Field Experiences, University at Albany
63) Roberts, Peter Professor, School of Educational Studies and Leadership, University of Canterbury, New Zealand
64) Rougle, Eija Instructor, State University of New York, Albany
65) Rudley, Lisa Director: Education Policy-Autism Action Network
66) Saltzman, Janet Science Chair, Physics Teacher, Red Hook High School
67) Schniedewind, Nancy Professor of Education, State University of New York, New Paltz
68) Silverberg, Ruth Associate Professor, College of Staten Island, City University of New York
69) Sperry, Carol Professor of Education, Emerita, Millersville University
70) St. John, Edward Algo D. Henderson Collegiate Professor, University of Michigan
71) Suzuki, Daiyu Teachers College at Columbia University
72) Swaffield, Sue Senior Lecturer, Educational Leadership and School Improvement, University of Cambridge
73) Tanis, Bianca Parent Member: ReThinking Testing
74) Thomas, Paul Associate Professor of Education, Furman University
75) Thrupp, Martin Professor of Education, University of Waikato, New Zealand
76) Tobin, KT Founding member, ReThinking Testing
77) Tomlinson, Sally Emeritus Professor, Goldsmiths College, University of London; Senior Research Fellow, Department of Education, Oxford University
78) Tuck, Eve Coordinator of Native American Studies, State University of New York at New Paltz
79) VanSlyke-Briggs Kjersti Associate Professor, State University of New York, Oneonta
80) Wilson, Elaine Faculty of Education, University of Cambridge
81) Wrigley, Terry Honorary senior research fellow, University of Ballarat, Australia
82) Zahedi, Katie Principal, Linden Ave Middle School, Red Hook, New York
83) Zhao, Yong Professor of Education, Presidential Chair, University of Oregon
No hay comentarios:
Publicar un comentario